Facebook blocks photo of Neptune statue for being ‘explicitly sexual’ : Software news



Facebook is facing renewed criticism after its software program appears to have blocked a photograph of a sixteenth-century statue of Neptune that stands inside the Piazza del Nettuno within the Italian city of Bologna, claiming it’s miles “sexually specific”.

Neighborhood creator Elisa Barbara had chosen the statue, which indicates Neptune bare and preserving a trident, to demonstrate her Facebook page “Testimonies, curiosities and views of Bologna.” But the Nettuno photo fell foul of the social media giant’s privacy regulations, the Everyday Telegraph stated.

Image result for facebook

In a statement, Fb instructed the artist: “Using the image became now not authorized as it violates Facebook’s tips on advertising. It affords a picture with content material that is explicitly sexual and indicates an excessive diploma of the frame, concentrating unnecessarily on frame parts.

“The usage of photographs or video of nude bodies or plunging necklines isn’t allowed, even if the use is for artistic or academic reasons.”

Barbara responded incredulously, posting on her Facebook page: “Yes to Neptune, no to censorship.”

She instructed the Telegraph: “I wanted to sell my web page; however, evidently, for Fb, the statue is a sexually expressed picture that shows off too much flesh. Simply Neptune? This is loopy! Through people’s Facebook walls, the home page is filled with photos. You can even search Facebook.

“How can a piece of art, our very personal statue of Neptune, be the item of censorship?”

The figure was created in the 1560s by a Flemish sculptor called Jean de Boulogne, nicknamed by the Italians Giambologna, and it has ruled the piazza for nearly 500 years.

“Again, inside the Fifties, all through celebrations for schoolchildren graduating, they used to cowl up Neptune,” Barbara said. “Maybe Fb could pick the statue to be dressed again.”

An Fb spokesperson later said in an announcement that the censorship became a mistake.
“Our team approaches tens of millions of advertising pics every week, and in a few instances, we incorrectly restrict ads. This picture does not violate our ad policies. We apologize for the error and have allowed the advertiser to understand we approve their advert.”

Facebook’s overzealous censoring software has brought the photos in social media into controversy with growing frequency, even because it faces excessive complaints on some other front for doing too little to save you the unfolding of “faux information”.

Ultimate 12 months, a Norwegian consumer changed directly to take away the 1972 Pulitzer-prevailing “Terror of Conflict” photograph of a naked lady running from napalm assaults for the duration of the Vietnam Warfare from a published about six that changed history.

In that case, Facebook additionally claimed the picture broke nudity rules. But, it later reversed its selection and issued an apology, announcing the company diagnosed “the records and worldwide importance of this photograph”.

“Because of its popularity as an iconic image of historical significance … we’ve determined to reinstate the photo on Fb in which we’re conscious it’s been eliminated,” the organisation said.

If so, Facebook leader working officer Sheryl Sandberg apologized to Norwegian prime minister Erna Solberg after the employer deleted a publish using her in which she shared the image in team spirit with Tom Egeland, a creator who had blanketed the Nick Ut photo as one in all seven pix he stated had “changed the records of warfare”.

“These are complicated selections, and we don’t continually get it right,” Sandberg wrote. “Even with clear standards, screening hundreds of thousands of posts on a case using case foundation each week is hard.

“However, we intend to do better. We’re dedicated to listening to our community and evolving. Thank you for supporting us to get this proper.”

In January 2015, the organization became accused of censoring images of Copenhagen’s Little Mermaid statue for allegedly containing “an excessive amount of bare pores and skin or sexual undertones”.

Fb says it restricts nudity because “some audiences within our worldwide network may be touchy to this type of content”. Some of the content often blocked are pics of genitals and naked buttocks.

Snapshots of a woman’s nipples were forbidden until a girl’s breasts had been “actively engaged in breastfeeding” or in which the image confirmed “breasts with post-mastectomy scarring”.

But Facebook’s troubles with monitoring and eliminating content published using its 1.4bn current customers look set to keep.

In November, it became stated that software evolved with Mark Zuckerberg’s aid will permit 0.33 events to screen and suppress the visibility of posts.

The social media giant became accused of growing the software program as part of its effort to get China to lift its seven-year ban on Fb, imposed after the Urumqi riots in July 2009 e, to stem the float of information about the unrest.

An Fb spokesperson stated: “We have lengthy said that we are interested in China and are spending time understanding and mastering more about the United States.”

Repeated accusations that Facebook locations unnecessarily hard standards on user content caused a shift in coverage. In October, while the business enterprise started, it introduced editorial standards analogous to a newspaper’s. It would no longer censor photograph cloth that is “newsworthy, tremendous, or vital to the public interest – even though they might in any other case violate our requirements”.

Image result for facebook photo upload
Photo Upload

“Our cause is to allow extra pix and Testimonies without posing safety risks or displaying image pictures to minors and others who do now not need to look at them,” Facebook executives Joel Kaplan and Justin Osofsky wrote announcing the change.

In Germany, Facebook is threatened with a legal motion over its facial reputation software, which critics say violates privacy and records legal protection guidelines.

The tool runs all images uploaded to the social networking website through a program and identifies the person’s pals in every photo. There has been an outcry since it rolled out in June to more than 500m members worldwide. Though customers can choose from automatic tagging, Facebook can gather and keep (indefinitely) all pics added to the web page.

Now, Hamburg’s information protection professional has written to Facebook to demand it stop strolling the facial popularity program on German customers and delete any associated statistics. Johannes Caspar said the German authorities would take motion if Fb did not comply and could face fines of up to three hundred 000 (£262,000).

“Need to Facebook maintains the characteristic; it needs to make sure that only information from men and women who have declared consent to the garage in their biometric facial profiles be stored in the database,” he said. The software offered the capability for “tremendous abuse” and changed into unlawful.


Image result for software

It’s now not the first time multinational generation companies have hit troubles in Germany, which takes online privacy significantly higher than many other international locations. In April, Google said it would no longer collect any more excellent photographs for its German Avenue View challenge. The decision followed a series of objections after mapping 20 German cities for the carrier, which takes snapshots of every Street and belonging inside a municipality. Germany’s privacy laws typically limit pix of human beings and assets except in public places, such as a carrying occasion, without someone’s consent.

“The legal state of affairs is obvious in my view,” Caspar instructed Wednesday’s Hamburger Abendblatt. “If the facts were to get into the wrong arms, then someone with a photo taken on a cellular cellphone ought to use biometrics to examine the snapshots and make an identification,” he said. Communist governments can utilize such a gadget for secret agents in the opposition or through security services worldwide. “The right to anonymity is at risk,” he stated.

Caspar is subsidized through the federal client safety ministry. “We assume Facebook to conform with all European and German information security requirements and for it to respond to the request from the Hamburg regional statistics protection officer,” said a spokeswoman.

A Facebook spokesperson told Spiegel online the corporation turned into looking at Caspar’s request; however, it “firmly rejected any accusations that we aren’t complying with our responsibilities to the Eu Union records protection laws”.

An expected 75bn photos have been uploaded to Fb because it changed into set up through Mark Zuckerberg as an online listing of Harvard University students in 2004.


A Syrian refugee who took a selfie with Angela Merkel has failed in his attempt to sue Fb over a chain of posts falsely linking him to terrorist assaults.

The picture that Anas Moda mini, from Darayya near Damascus, took of himself and the German chancellor at a Berlin refugee refuge in September 2015 has been time and again shared on doctored photomontages supposedly identifying him as the culprit behind crimes and terrorist assaults across Europe.

In January, Modamani’s attorney filed an initial injunction against Fb Europe “to save you, Facebook, from publishing the slanderous photo of the Syrian refugee Anas Moda mini inside the context of terrorist assaults”.

But a courtroom within the southern metropolis of Würzburg on Tuesday rejected Modamani’s injunction, with the chief choose arguing that Facebook was now not obliged to proactively seek out and delete defamatory posts since the social media large changed into “neither a perpetrator nor participant within the smears”.

Modamani’s attorney, Chan-jo Jun, hoped the case might result in social media platforms being compelled to delete slanderous posts no longer directly when way users had flagged them up; however, they are actively trying to find out and stop the proliferation of illegal content. Facebook’s criminal crew has argued that there may be no “miracle software program” that robotically blocks previously deleted content material from being uploaded once more.



Aly Jones
Twitter evangelist. Web fanatic. Lifelong travel nerd. Passionate zombie scholar. Extreme coffee fan. Amateur entrepreneur. Avid beer lover. Had moderate success lecturing about wieners in the UK. Won several awards for short selling clip-on ties in Hanford, CA. Uniquely-equipped for creating marketing channels for cod in Bethesda, MD. Spent a weekend buying and selling Easter candy in Phoenix, AZ. Was quite successful at analyzing tar in the government sector. Have a strong interest in getting to know barbie dolls for fun and profit.